Organic Foods No Better Than Regular?

The FSA (Food Standards Agency) inexplicably tookthe use of genetically modified crop strains. It seems
a stab at discrediting the value of organic foods bythis most recent attempt by the FSA to discredit the
commissioning a recent study from the London Schoolimportance of organic foods completely misses the
of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, which found nomark and shows its bias by focusing solely on nutrient
major differences in "nutrient content" between organiccontent and not on the potential dangers of
and conventional foods. "What it shows is that there isnon-organic food. Yet the titles of the reports are
little, if any, nutritional difference between organic andcrafted to oversimplify into a "vitamins = health"
conventionally produced food and that there is noargument, a grossly false premise which only leaves
evidence of additional health benefits from eatingconsumers confused and frustrated.
organic food." The report went on to concede thatEven the most knowledgeable shoppers are duped by
they did find traces of pesticides in the urine ofperfect packaging or creative marketing and the use
participants who consumed the non-organic foods,of meaningless phrases like "all natural" or "lite", and are
though it was buried towards the end. The findingstotally in the dark when it comes to the actual origins
were then presented under the false assumption thatof their food supply. Michael Pollan, best-selling author
consumers pay higher prices for organic foodsand professor of journalism at UC Berkeley states in
believing they have a higher content of nutrients, orhis book, In Defense of Food, "We have changed the
those figures printed on a food nutrition label. Theway we eat more in the last 50 years than in the
report, however, is fatally flawed in that it completelyprevious 10,000." Real food has given way to
fails to recognize the primary reason consumers buyprofit-seeking corporations engaged in "manufacturing"
organic in the first place. The bigger picture is missing,and "engineering" food - as opposed to "growing" food
thus this fleeting "discovery" is just that, fleeting.- using crops subsidized by the government which
Let's forget for a moment that there are just as manyrewards them with huge profits.
studies that actually reached the opposite conclusion.We've come up with brilliant inventions like high
One of the most significant, being a four-year studyfructose corn syrup and partially hydrogenated oils so
done by Newcastle University in which researcherswe can make cheap sugars and "plastic fats" that can
grew fruits, vegetables, and raised cattle on bothstay on grocery store shelves for years without fear
organic and non-organic sites across Europe spanningof spoiling. We've also found efficient ways of
725 acres. The study found that organic fruits andproducing meat (though totally neglectful of our health,
vegetables contained as much as forty percent (40%)the environment, and the animals) that is cheaper and
higher levels of antioxidants, which are believed tofaster, therefore much more lucrative. We no longer
reduce the risk of cancer and heart disease. The milkeat "real food" and it's affecting our health. Back in the
from the organic cattle contained between fifty and1950s we Americans spent around 5% of our annual
eighty percent (50-80%) more antioxidants thanincome on health care and almost 20% on food.
"conventionally-produced" milk.Today it's almost the exact opposite, so it seems
The study didn't even touch on the list of undesirablethere must be a direct correlation between food
substances the "conventional" milk DID contain, whichquality and overall health. We as consumers are
brings us to the number one reason why organic foodgetting a lower quality of food at a lower price but at
is becoming more popular. Organic food, by law, doeswhat cost? Those dollars we used to spend on quality
not contain pesticides, growth hormones, chemicalsfood must now be diverted to prescription medications
introduced to artificially ripen or preserve, or otherto counteract the effects of our poor food supply.
potentially harmful substances in addition to prohibiting