The Problem with Being Ahead of Your Time

"Consumers prefer to be spoon-fed changes withmanufacturing approach, first data dictionary, etc., but
teaspoons."suffice it to say people said we were years ahead of
- Bryce's LawINTRODUCTIONNot too long agoour time.The competition wasn't far behind either, as
Panasonic's corporate slogan was, "Just slightly aheadother commercial methodologies were introduced as
of our time." It was catchy and it inferred their productswell as structured programming techniques and data
were on the cutting edge of the industry. There wasdictionary systems. I could easily argue how "PRIDE"
only one problem with this, as Panasonic found out,was superior in so many ways, but as I mentioned
people feel uncomfortable using products ahead ofbefore, consumers are not really interested. Instead,
their time. Consequently, their slogan was changed to,they selected cheaper alternatives which were
"Ideas for Life." But this essay is not so much aboutimplemented badly. Regardless, they thought they had
slogans as it is about marketing products ahead ofpurchased a bargain.Based on legal advice, we
their time. The marketing graveyard is full of fineoriginally sold "PRIDE" as a proprietary product requiring
examples of products that were introduced andthe use of a nondisclosure agreement to be made
considered ahead of their time:privy to its contents. This was both good and bad. It
was good in the sense it allowed us to protect the
Sony's Betamax video recorder was introduced in theproduct from misappropriation (which was tested in a
mid-1970's and was well regarded as a superior andcourt of law), but it was bad in the sense we were
quality product over its competition. The VHS formathandcuffed from disseminating information on how it
ultimately unseated the Betamax though, not becauseworked. While MBA was restrained from public
of superior quality but primarily due to cheaper costs. Indisclosure our competition propagated their products
less than ten years Betamax was gone.Xerox's Starthrough the media. So much so, that "PRIDE" faded
computer was introduced in 1981. It was also a qualityfrom public view.As the first in the industry, we made
product that was ahead of its time, featuring aour money early on and invested a lot of it back into
Graphical User Interface (GUI) that was copied bythe product in the form of research and development.
Apple, Microsoft, and just about everyone else.TheConsequently, "PRIDE" evolved into a much larger
GRiD Compass 1101 computer was released in 1982product that now tackles issues such as Enterprise
and is the first true laptop as we understand it today,Engineering and Data Base Engineering. Frankly, it
with a sleek design that included a screen that closedbecame more robust than the average person could
on top of the keyboard, a built-in modem, bubbleassimilate which is one reason why, in 2004, we finally
memory, and it ran on batteries. But the product wasn'tput it in the public domain through the Internet.As I have
cheap and sold for upwards to $10,000 making itwritten in the past, the market has changed
prohibitive to purchase for the average businessconsiderably over the last 35 years since "PRIDE" was
person. Even worse, it didn't support the IBM PCintroduced. The people have changed, the technology
architecture making it incompatible with popularhas changed, but the problems haven't, e.g.; the backlog
programs of the day.IBM has also had its fair share ofof user information requirements has gotten longer, not
products that were ahead of its time and metshorter; systems still lack integration; companies are
premature deaths; including their Token Ring LANplagued by redundant information resources; lack of
which was ultimately supplanted by Ethernet. IBM's PSdocumentation; fire fighting is still the common mode of
2 line of computers was introduced in 1987 as aoperating; projects come in late and over budget,
means to recapture the PC market. The PS/2 includedetc.Recently, I was giving a "PRIDE" presentation to a
a proprietary "Microchannel Architecture" which,startup company with some rather young analysts and
although advanced and sophisticated, led to its demiseprogrammers who are not as well versed in the
from competitive "open" offerings. And finally, we havehistory of the industry as I am. All they knew was
IBM's OS/2 operating system which was alsobasically what their college professors and instructors
introduced in the late 1980's and was the first 32-bithad taught them. I didn't do anything fancy, I just
operating system for the PC platform. OS/2 was milesexplained the basic "PRIDE" concepts such as
ahead of everything else (and arguably still is).Information Driven Design, Standard System Structure,
Nonetheless, its strengths became its weaknesses asLayered Documentation, the System/Data Relationship,
it was deemed too sophisticated for the average user;IRM, etc. I kept it simple and to the point and this
this coupled with aggressive marketing by Microsoftperplexed one of the attendees who approached me
and incompetent marketing by IBM led to its doom.after the session and said, "I have been attending a lot
LESSONS LEARNEDWhat can be learned fromof seminars and conferences lately on these subjects.
these experiences? Three things:I learned more in the last three hours than from all of
A product doesn't have to be superior in order tothe sessions I attended over the last five months.
dominate a market; all that is required is just a littleWhere have you been?" Naturally, I was flattered by
marketing hustle. You have to remember, thehis comments but explained how the industry lost its
consumer believes all products of the same ilk areway over the years and is only now trying to reinvent
essentially the same. If it comes down tosystems theory. I told him there was really nothing new
technologically superior features or cost, the consumeror magical in developing systems, so long as you
will always take the cheaper product. Advanceddemand precise terminology and clarity of concepts. I
features are nice, but the consumer must believe theysaid, "Don't look for cryptic solutions, there is no
are warranted and add value to their lives.For broadpanacea. The best solutions are the simple
market acceptance, the product must be built on opensolutions."As I traveled home I thought about the
standards. This was the hard lesson IBM learned incomments made by the class and considered where
building its products.Consumers prefer to be spoon-fed"PRIDE" stood in relation to the rest of the industry we
changes with teaspoons. It takes real visionaries tocreated. By staying the course "PRIDE" may not be
adopt new ideas and, unfortunately, they are few andthe best known methodology out there, but it is still light
far between. The consumer wants simple solutionsyears ahead of the industry. Such is the price of being
they can easily assimilate. Remember, most peopleahead of your time.CONCLUSIONAs mentioned,
are afraid of major changes of any kind."PRIDE" has evolved into a substantial body of work
Let's also recognize that being first in your field is notwhich is one reason why we went public with it. By
easy in that you are ultimately inventing and cultivatingitself, there is enough material to make a full college
your own market place. Inevitably you will makecurriculum out of it. And hopefully this will happen.But
marketing mistakes along the way which copycatthe other reason we put "PRIDE" in the public domain
competitors will leap on. Further, they will offer inferiorwas to establish an open standard thereby
products at a greatly reduced price. We have seenovercoming one of the deficiencies I mentioned
this time and again in the I.T. industry alone.The onlyearlier."PRIDE" is still way ahead of itself. It will probably
true benefit of being the first in your field is that youalways be so. But as we celebrate our 35th year of
have the market to yourself, at least for a while. Duringbusiness I have come to realize that "PRIDE" is so old,
this period of time you should rake in as much moneythat it is new to those people who were born after it
as possible, refine your product, and expand thewas introduced. As Milt liked to say, "The original and
market as much as possible. And if you're makingstill the best."Tim Bryce is the Managing Director of M.
money, you can be sure competitors won't be farBryce & Associates (MBA) of Palm Harbor, Florida, a
behind."PRIDE"Our company has learned these lessonsmanagement consulting firm specializing in Information
the hard way. The "PRIDE" Methodologies for IRMResource Management (IRM). Mr. Bryce has over 30
were first introduced in 1971, beginning with ouryears of experience in the field. He is available for
Information Systems Engineering Methodology (ISEM).training and consulting on an international basis. His
And by doing so, MBA created the methodologycorporate web page is at:
market. I could go on and on as to all of the conceptscan be contacted at: Copyright 2006 MBA. All rights
and innovations we introduced, e.g., first commercialreserved.
methodology, first to take an engineering